Prediction of Martin Damm [744th] vs Luca Castagnola [655th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L L L L
Form
W L W W W W W W L LHead-To-Head: Damm 1 - 0 Castagnola
They have played 3 sets in total, with Damm winning 2 and Castagnola winning 1. The last match between Damm and Castagnola was at the M15 Oberhaching, 11-02-2025, First, I.hard with Martin Damm getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin Damm | 1 |
| Luca Castagnola | 0 |
| Damm | Stats | Castagnola |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (11-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 744 | Ranking | 655 |
| 175 | Highest Rank | 625 |
| 21 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (147-116) | Career Total W/L | 56% (165-130) |
| $107,985 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Damm VS Castagnola H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Martin Damm
Player
Luca Castagnola
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
17
Aces
19
6
Double Faults
7
84%
(
62 of
74)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
29 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Damm VS Castagnola H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 18 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:40:59 | Average Match Time | 2:40:59 |
| 69% (74/107) | 1st Serve % | 67% (69/103) |
| 84% (62/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (58/69) |
| 48% (16/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (19/34) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 25% (26/103) | Return Points Win % | 27% (29/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martin Damm vs Luca Castagnola Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Damm 1 - 0 Castagnola
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damm has won 48.11% of points on their second serve, while Castagnola has won 44.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damm, in recent form, has won 46.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Castagnola has won 49.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20% and 28.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Damm has saved 61.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Castagnola has saved 50.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Damm has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 12/ 16), with Castagnola winning 44.64% (W/L 25/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 73/ 46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 42/ 43). Castagnola has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 57/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 101/ 86).
- Player level: In the last year, Damm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 11/ 3), where as Castagnola has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Damm winning 1 times and Castagnola being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Damm winning 2 and Castagnola winning 1. The last match between Damm and Castagnola was at the M15 Oberhaching, 11-02-2025, First, I.hard with Martin Damm getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Damm and Castagnola have played a deciding set 1 times, with Damm winning 1 times and Castagnola 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Damm winning 2, and Castagnola 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.21 while Castagnola has played against players with an average rank of 181.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damm has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Castagnola has won 32% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Damm has converted 30.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Castagnola has converted 37.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Martin Damm
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
56%
(
9 of
16)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
19
Total Points Won
21
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
20 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Robert Strombachs
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
75%
(
77 of
103)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
51 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
54 of
77)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
24%
(
22 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Moise Kouame
68%
(
71 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
81 of
118)
17
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Carlo Alberto Caniato
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
19
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
49 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
12 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Mattias Southcombe
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Alexandr Binda
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
21
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Castagnola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 2-6 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Tadeas Paroulek
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Abel Forger
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Fabien Salle
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Giannicola Misasi
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Luca Castagnola
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Denys Klok
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
12 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Damm vs Castagnola?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Damm Vs Castagnola is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (147/116) | Win/Loss | 56% (165/130) |
| 55% (338/278) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (378/307) |
| 52% (3209/3006) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3480/3142) |
| 0.79 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 2410 | Aces Total | 167 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1035 | Total Double Faults | 693 |
| 1:43:23 | Average Match Time | 1:13:28 |
| 299.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 145.11 |
| 59% (11217/19001) | 1st Serve % | 67% (8872/13144) |
| 75% (8464/11217) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5457/8872) |
| 49% (3839/7784) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1997/4272) |
| 39% (587/1501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (731/1497) |
| 36% (6567/18422) | Return Points Win % | 44% (5824/13261) |
| 55% (142/257) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (158/286) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 53% (72/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (30/69) |
| 48% (46/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (45/98) |
| 78% (158/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (159/135) |
| 22% (158/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (159/24) |
| 19% (105/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (136/29) |
See recent tennis photos of Damm and Castagnola
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
